![]() It was the switch to low-level emulation that broke those 2 games in the performance profile. ![]() bsnes v079 and earlier, which have high-level emulation of the Cx4, can run Mega Man X2 and Mega Man X3 in the performance profile. There was no way to play Mega Man X2 or Mega Man X3 on bsnes v080's performance profile!ĮDIT 3: Exactly as I feared. But unlike with higan v094 and later, reloading the game wouldn't fix it. I think it goes all the way back to bsnes v080, when low-level Hitachi DSP (Cx4) emulation was introduced.ĮDIT 2: Yep, bsnes v080's performance profile cannot handle the Cx4 either. I made it stop working after April 1st for exactly this reason.ĮDIT: higan v094's performance profile also suffers from the same bug. It restored the HLE of the DSPs and Cx4 and disallowed headerless ROMs (offering to convert your ROMs to headered). In fact, I once made an April Fools satire of Lunar Magic that I called Lunar SNES. I don't want to encourage people to simply ignore the firmwares as they can with bsnes-mercury. If I bring back high-level emulation of the DSPs and the Cx4, I'll have to modify it slightly in order to still require the firmware in order to activate. I really don't want to become the next bsnes-mercury. The scary part is that it likely will work if I bring back high-level emulation of the Cx4 like what bsnes v073 and bsnes-classic have. And when running my homebrew program that dumps the ST018 and Cx4 firmwares and the DSP# data ROMs, bsnes-mcfly outright crashes while higan simply hangs (only with the performance profile, of course). The bug also affects Mega Man X3, the only other Cx4-based game. And just like with bsnes-mcfly, higan-accuracy and higan-balanced can run Mega Man X2 the first time, and higan-performance requires reloading the game in order to work. Jonathan Lansner is the business columnist for the Southern California News Group.I have since gathered more information about the performance profile Cx4 bug: it also affects higan v098, the last version of higan to have the balanced and performance profiles. 2007: Prices fell 30% in 10 months, with losses that grew to 59% in 21 months.1991: Prices fell 6% in 10 months, with losses that grew to 20% over 69 months.Compare that dip with the 10-month drops off in previous peaks: Steeply falling prices have yet to get house hunters in a serious shopping mood.Īnd please note the California median benchmark is 18% off its $900,000 peak of May 2022, just 10 months earlier. “However, any decline in rates is not likely to be sustainable since inflation remains high, and the Federal Reserve is willing to take some calculated risks in order to keep inflation under control.” Bottom Line “The recent failure of a handful of tech-focused banks caused an unexpected drop in interest rates, which could offer an opportunity in the near term for homebuyers who have been waiting on the sidelines to lock in a lower rate,” said Jordan Levine, the association’s chief economist. Prices have dipped in eight out of the last nine months.Īnd the median is down 4.8% in a year to the lowest level since $699,000 in February 2021. The California median was $735,480, off 2.1% in a month. ![]() “A brief interest rate reprieve and softer home prices during January created a window of opportunity for homebuyers to dip their toes into the home-buying waters, which helped boost home sales to the highest level in five months,” said Jennifer Branchini, the association’s president and a Bay Area Realtor. ![]() $186 million deal for huge Bay Area industrial center ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |